Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) indirect speech (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: indirect speech


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_Lenguajetxt112 - : Van der Houwen encuentra, entre otros aspectos, que los hablantes usan más el DD que el DI: “indirect speech is the marked strategy (15%) and direct speech the unmarked strategy (total: 85% )” (^[60]Van der Houwen, 1998, p. 129). De igual manera, encontró que se elide más el sujeto en el DD, pues su resultado “shows the expected correlation between the presence of the subject and indirect speech: 30% (vs. 15% of absent subjects)” (^[61]Van der Houwen, 1998, p. 129). A partir de estos resultados, ^[62]Van der Houwen (1998) concluye que “indirect and direct speech, indeed, each have a distinctive functional communicative effect. Their distribution is not random, but depends on the message the speaker wants to convey” (p. 132).

2
paper CO_Íkalatxt11 - : Polite behaviour is subject to the features of the interaction which are socioculturally marked by the speech community beyond what is regarded as political behaviour. Thus, Brown and Levinson's strategies of positive and negative politeness are interpreted as socio-culturally determined politic behaviour. Likewise, it will have to pay attention to whether examples of linguistic politeness such as terms of address, honorifics, ritualised expressions and speech events, and indirect speech acts are polite forms or whether they are used normally as socio-culturally constrained forms of politic behaviour (Watts, 1992:51 ). Therefore, politic behaviour is just a socially appropriated behaviour and terms of address are realisations of politic behaviour.

Evaluando al candidato indirect speech:


1) politic: 4
2) behaviour: 4
3) houwen: 4

indirect speech
Lengua:
Frec: 44
Docs: 24
Nombre propio: / 44 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.724 = ( + (1+3.70043971814109) / (1+5.49185309632967)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
indirect speech
: 33. Searle, John R. 1975. Indirect speech acts. En Peter Cole y JamesMorgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 59-82. New York: Academic Press.
: 36. van der Houwen, F. (1998). Organizing discourse. Direct and indirect speech in Mexican Spanish. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 15, 123-134.
: Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (2001). Indirect speech acts. Synthese, 128, 183-228.
: Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech, Foundations of Language, 10,1: 1-39.
: Clark, H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430-477.
: Gibbs, R. (1986). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 181-196.
: Goodell, Elizabeth W. y Jacqueline Sachs. 1992. Direct and indirect speech in children’s retold narratives, Discourse Processes, 15: 395-422.
: Grice, H. P. (1998). Further notes on Logic and Conversation. En A. Kasher (Ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts: Vol. 6. Presupposition, implicature and indirect speech (pp. 162-176). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
: Kvavik, K. H. (1986), “Characteristics of direct and reported speech prosody: Evidence from Spanish”, en F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech, La Haya, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 333-360.
: Köder, Franziska y Emar Maier. 2016. Children mix direct and indirect speech: evidence from pronoun comprehension, Journal of Child Language , 43,4: 843-866.
: Leskiv, Alina. 2009. The literary phenomenon of free indirect speech, Studia Anglica Rsoviensia, 6: 51-58.
: Liberman, Mark y Sag, I. (1975). Intonational Disambiguation of Indirect Speech Acts. CLS, 11, 487-497.
: Morgan, Jerry. 1978. "Two types of convention in indirect speech acts". En Peter Cole (ed.) Syntax and semantics. Vol 9: Pragmatics. Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Nordqvist, Asa. 2001. The use of direct and indirect speech by 1 ½ - to 4-year-olds, Psychology of Language and Communication, 5: 57-66. (en línea) Disponible en [166]http://www.plc.psychologia.pl/plc/plc/contents/fulltext/05-1_4.pdf
: Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. En P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59-82). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Tannen, D. (1986), “Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative”, Direct and Indirect Speech, 31, pp. 311-332.
: Van der Houwen, F. (1998). Organizing discourse. Direct and Indirect Speech in Mexican Spanish. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 15(1), 123-134.